UP-BOARD-XII SERIES Civics
India S External Relations
18 previous year questions.
Volume: 18 Ques
Yield: Medium
High-Yield Trend
18
2025 Chapter Questions 18 MCQs
01
PYQ 2025
easy
civics ID: up-board
When was the Shimla Agreement signed?
Official Solution
Correct Option: (1)
02
PYQ 2025
medium
civics ID: up-board
Evaluate the causes of tension in the relations between India and China.
Official Solution
Correct Option: (1)
The relationship between India and China has been historically complex, marked by both cooperation and tension. The causes of tension between the two countries are multifaceted, rooted in historical, territorial, and geopolitical factors. Below are the key causes of tension between India and China: 1. Territorial Disputes:
- One of the main causes of tension is the unresolved border dispute between India and China, particularly in the regions of Aksai Chin (disputed by India and China) and Arunachal Pradesh (which China claims as part of Tibet).
- The 1962 Sino-Indian War was fought over these territorial issues, and the conflict remains unresolved to this day.
2. The Tibet Issue:
- After the Chinese annexation of Tibet in 1950, tensions increased as India granted asylum to the Tibetan spiritual leader, Dalai Lama, in 1959.
- China perceives India's support for Tibetan separatists as a threat to its territorial integrity, while India views the occupation of Tibet by China as a violation of Tibetan autonomy.
3. Geopolitical Competition:
- Chinaβs growing influence in South Asia, particularly its close ties with Pakistan, has raised security concerns for India.
- The development of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) through disputed Kashmir has further exacerbated Indiaβs concerns.
4. Economic Disparities:
- Despite economic cooperation, trade imbalances have led to growing tensions. China has a significant trade surplus with India, creating economic frustration.
- India's reliance on Chinese goods has been a point of contention, especially when it comes to the strategic sectors like technology and infrastructure.
5. Military Build-up and Border Clashes:
- In recent years, there has been a significant military build-up along the borders in Ladakh and other disputed regions.
- The Doklam standoff in 2017 and the ongoing military skirmishes in the Galwan Valley in 2020 highlighted the continued military tensions between the two countries.
6. Regional Influence and Alliances:
- Chinaβs growing influence in the Indian Ocean region, and its βString of Pearlsβ strategy (setting up naval bases and infrastructure across Indiaβs maritime neighborhood) is viewed as a strategic challenge by India.
Conclusion:
The causes of tension between India and China are deeply rooted in territorial disputes, historical grievances, and evolving geopolitical dynamics. Despite attempts at diplomacy and economic cooperation, the relationship remains fraught with strategic competition and mistrust.
- One of the main causes of tension is the unresolved border dispute between India and China, particularly in the regions of Aksai Chin (disputed by India and China) and Arunachal Pradesh (which China claims as part of Tibet).
- The 1962 Sino-Indian War was fought over these territorial issues, and the conflict remains unresolved to this day.
2. The Tibet Issue:
- After the Chinese annexation of Tibet in 1950, tensions increased as India granted asylum to the Tibetan spiritual leader, Dalai Lama, in 1959.
- China perceives India's support for Tibetan separatists as a threat to its territorial integrity, while India views the occupation of Tibet by China as a violation of Tibetan autonomy.
3. Geopolitical Competition:
- Chinaβs growing influence in South Asia, particularly its close ties with Pakistan, has raised security concerns for India.
- The development of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) through disputed Kashmir has further exacerbated Indiaβs concerns.
4. Economic Disparities:
- Despite economic cooperation, trade imbalances have led to growing tensions. China has a significant trade surplus with India, creating economic frustration.
- India's reliance on Chinese goods has been a point of contention, especially when it comes to the strategic sectors like technology and infrastructure.
5. Military Build-up and Border Clashes:
- In recent years, there has been a significant military build-up along the borders in Ladakh and other disputed regions.
- The Doklam standoff in 2017 and the ongoing military skirmishes in the Galwan Valley in 2020 highlighted the continued military tensions between the two countries.
6. Regional Influence and Alliances:
- Chinaβs growing influence in the Indian Ocean region, and its βString of Pearlsβ strategy (setting up naval bases and infrastructure across Indiaβs maritime neighborhood) is viewed as a strategic challenge by India.
Conclusion:
The causes of tension between India and China are deeply rooted in territorial disputes, historical grievances, and evolving geopolitical dynamics. Despite attempts at diplomacy and economic cooperation, the relationship remains fraught with strategic competition and mistrust.
03
PYQ 2025
medium
civics ID: up-board
Discuss the main features of Indian foreign policy.
Official Solution
Correct Option: (1)
India's foreign policy has been characterized by the principle of Non-Alignment, the promotion of peace and security, and a focus on economic cooperation and development. The key features of Indian foreign policy can be outlined as follows: 1. Non-Alignment Movement (NAM):
One of the most prominent features of Indiaβs foreign policy post-independence was its commitment to non-alignment. India, under Jawaharlal Nehru, refrained from joining either of the two power blocs during the Cold War (the US-led Western bloc or the Soviet-led Eastern bloc). India advocated for an independent, third path in international politics. This was aimed at ensuring India's sovereignty and fostering peaceful international relations.
2. Support for Decolonization:
India actively supported independence movements in Asia, Africa, and Latin America. As a newly independent country itself, India championed the cause of decolonization and the self-determination of peoples. It provided political and moral support to freedom movements, particularly in African nations.
3. Strategic Autonomy:
Indiaβs foreign policy has always prioritized strategic autonomy, balancing relations with major powers without being overly dependent on any one country. India maintained diplomatic ties with both the US and the Soviet Union, depending on the issue at hand, while also cultivating relationships with non-aligned nations.
4. Peace and Security:
India has long been committed to promoting peace and security in the international arena. It has played an active role in the United Nations, participated in peacekeeping missions, and called for nuclear disarmament. India has also sought to resolve regional disputes through dialogue, notably with Pakistan and China.
5. Economic Diplomacy:
In recent decades, Indiaβs foreign policy has also focused on economic diplomacy. With the growth of its economy, India has pursued closer economic relations with key global players, including the United States, Japan, and the European Union. India has been an advocate for global free trade and has strengthened ties with neighboring countries in South Asia.
6. Look East and Act East Policy:
India's βLook Eastβ and later βAct Eastβ policies focused on enhancing relations with Southeast Asia, East Asia, and the Pacific region. India has sought to increase its presence in the Asia-Pacific, focusing on trade, security, and regional cooperation.
Conclusion:
Indiaβs foreign policy reflects its unique position in global politics. By balancing principles of non-alignment with pragmatic economic interests and strategic autonomy, India has established itself as a key player in regional and global affairs.
One of the most prominent features of Indiaβs foreign policy post-independence was its commitment to non-alignment. India, under Jawaharlal Nehru, refrained from joining either of the two power blocs during the Cold War (the US-led Western bloc or the Soviet-led Eastern bloc). India advocated for an independent, third path in international politics. This was aimed at ensuring India's sovereignty and fostering peaceful international relations.
2. Support for Decolonization:
India actively supported independence movements in Asia, Africa, and Latin America. As a newly independent country itself, India championed the cause of decolonization and the self-determination of peoples. It provided political and moral support to freedom movements, particularly in African nations.
3. Strategic Autonomy:
Indiaβs foreign policy has always prioritized strategic autonomy, balancing relations with major powers without being overly dependent on any one country. India maintained diplomatic ties with both the US and the Soviet Union, depending on the issue at hand, while also cultivating relationships with non-aligned nations.
4. Peace and Security:
India has long been committed to promoting peace and security in the international arena. It has played an active role in the United Nations, participated in peacekeeping missions, and called for nuclear disarmament. India has also sought to resolve regional disputes through dialogue, notably with Pakistan and China.
5. Economic Diplomacy:
In recent decades, Indiaβs foreign policy has also focused on economic diplomacy. With the growth of its economy, India has pursued closer economic relations with key global players, including the United States, Japan, and the European Union. India has been an advocate for global free trade and has strengthened ties with neighboring countries in South Asia.
6. Look East and Act East Policy:
India's βLook Eastβ and later βAct Eastβ policies focused on enhancing relations with Southeast Asia, East Asia, and the Pacific region. India has sought to increase its presence in the Asia-Pacific, focusing on trade, security, and regional cooperation.
Conclusion:
Indiaβs foreign policy reflects its unique position in global politics. By balancing principles of non-alignment with pragmatic economic interests and strategic autonomy, India has established itself as a key player in regional and global affairs.
04
PYQ 2025
medium
civics ID: up-board
βBorder dispute and trade are the bases of current India-China relation.β Review the statement.
Official Solution
Correct Option: (1)
Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
The statement suggests that the contemporary relationship between India and China is defined by two primary, yet contrasting, pillars: conflict arising from border disputes and cooperation driven by trade. This review requires an analysis of both these aspects to determine the statement's validity.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
The statement is largely accurate as it captures the dualistic and complex nature of the India-China relationship.
1. Border Dispute as a Basis of Conflict:
The unresolved border dispute is the most significant source of contention and mistrust between the two nations.
Historical Context: The dispute stems from the 1962 Sino-Indian War and differing perceptions of the border, particularly along the McMahon Line in the east and the Aksai Chin region in the west.
Ongoing Tensions: The border has remained a live issue, leading to frequent stand-offs and military confrontations. The Doklam standoff in 2017 and the violent clashes in the Galwan Valley in 2020 are recent examples that have severely strained relations and led to a military build-up on both sides.
Impact: The border dispute overshadows all other aspects of the relationship, creating strategic competition and preventing the normalization of ties. It remains the primary driver of political and military friction.
2. Trade as a Basis of Cooperation and Interdependence:
Despite the political tensions, economic engagement has been a key component of the relationship for the past few decades.
Economic Growth: Bilateral trade between India and China has grown exponentially, making China one of India's largest trading partners. This economic interdependence has created a strong incentive for both countries to manage their disputes and avoid a full-scale conflict.
Trade Imbalance: However, the trade relationship is heavily skewed in China's favour, with India having a massive trade deficit. This has become a point of concern for India, which is trying to reduce its dependence on Chinese imports.
Pragmatic Engagement: Trade has served as a stabilizing factor, forcing the two countries to maintain channels of communication. It represents the pragmatic side of the relationship, where economic interests often coexist with strategic rivalry.
Step 3: Final Answer:
In review, the statement is valid. The India-China relationship is a complex balancing act. The unresolved border dispute acts as a constant source of friction and potential conflict, defining the strategic rivalry. Simultaneously, the substantial trade relationship acts as a binding factor, creating economic interdependence and compelling a degree of pragmatic cooperation. These two pillarsβone of conflict and one of cooperationβare indeed the primary bases of the current relationship.
The statement suggests that the contemporary relationship between India and China is defined by two primary, yet contrasting, pillars: conflict arising from border disputes and cooperation driven by trade. This review requires an analysis of both these aspects to determine the statement's validity.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
The statement is largely accurate as it captures the dualistic and complex nature of the India-China relationship.
1. Border Dispute as a Basis of Conflict:
The unresolved border dispute is the most significant source of contention and mistrust between the two nations.
Historical Context: The dispute stems from the 1962 Sino-Indian War and differing perceptions of the border, particularly along the McMahon Line in the east and the Aksai Chin region in the west.
Ongoing Tensions: The border has remained a live issue, leading to frequent stand-offs and military confrontations. The Doklam standoff in 2017 and the violent clashes in the Galwan Valley in 2020 are recent examples that have severely strained relations and led to a military build-up on both sides.
Impact: The border dispute overshadows all other aspects of the relationship, creating strategic competition and preventing the normalization of ties. It remains the primary driver of political and military friction.
2. Trade as a Basis of Cooperation and Interdependence:
Despite the political tensions, economic engagement has been a key component of the relationship for the past few decades.
Economic Growth: Bilateral trade between India and China has grown exponentially, making China one of India's largest trading partners. This economic interdependence has created a strong incentive for both countries to manage their disputes and avoid a full-scale conflict.
Trade Imbalance: However, the trade relationship is heavily skewed in China's favour, with India having a massive trade deficit. This has become a point of concern for India, which is trying to reduce its dependence on Chinese imports.
Pragmatic Engagement: Trade has served as a stabilizing factor, forcing the two countries to maintain channels of communication. It represents the pragmatic side of the relationship, where economic interests often coexist with strategic rivalry.
Step 3: Final Answer:
In review, the statement is valid. The India-China relationship is a complex balancing act. The unresolved border dispute acts as a constant source of friction and potential conflict, defining the strategic rivalry. Simultaneously, the substantial trade relationship acts as a binding factor, creating economic interdependence and compelling a degree of pragmatic cooperation. These two pillarsβone of conflict and one of cooperationβare indeed the primary bases of the current relationship.
05
PYQ 2025
medium
civics ID: up-board
Describe any three factors that influenced the foreign policy of India after independence.
Official Solution
Correct Option: (1)
Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
India's foreign policy after 1947 was shaped by a combination of its historical experiences, domestic needs, and the international political environment of the time.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
Three major factors that influenced India's foreign policy after independence were:
1. The Legacy of the Anti-Colonial Struggle: India's long struggle for freedom against British colonialism deeply influenced its foreign policy. This resulted in a strong opposition to colonialism and imperialism everywhere in the world and a commitment to protecting its own sovereignty. This historical experience was a key reason for India's decision not to join any military bloc.
2. The Cold War Context: India became independent at the beginning of the Cold War, a period of intense rivalry between the US and the USSR. To preserve its autonomy and avoid being drawn into superpower conflicts, India, under the leadership of its first Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru, championed the policy of Non-Alignment. This became the cornerstone of its foreign policy.
3. Domestic Economic Challenges: As a newly independent and economically underdeveloped country, India's primary domestic challenge was poverty and the need for rapid economic development. Its foreign policy was, therefore, designed to promote peace and stability in its neighbourhood and globally, which would allow it to focus its resources on development. It also sought to maintain friendly relations with all countries, including both superpowers, to secure economic and technical assistance.
Step 3: Final Answer:
Three factors that shaped post-independence Indian foreign policy were its anti-colonial legacy, the prevailing Cold War rivalry which led to the policy of Non-Alignment, and the pressing need for economic development.
India's foreign policy after 1947 was shaped by a combination of its historical experiences, domestic needs, and the international political environment of the time.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
Three major factors that influenced India's foreign policy after independence were:
1. The Legacy of the Anti-Colonial Struggle: India's long struggle for freedom against British colonialism deeply influenced its foreign policy. This resulted in a strong opposition to colonialism and imperialism everywhere in the world and a commitment to protecting its own sovereignty. This historical experience was a key reason for India's decision not to join any military bloc.
2. The Cold War Context: India became independent at the beginning of the Cold War, a period of intense rivalry between the US and the USSR. To preserve its autonomy and avoid being drawn into superpower conflicts, India, under the leadership of its first Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru, championed the policy of Non-Alignment. This became the cornerstone of its foreign policy.
3. Domestic Economic Challenges: As a newly independent and economically underdeveloped country, India's primary domestic challenge was poverty and the need for rapid economic development. Its foreign policy was, therefore, designed to promote peace and stability in its neighbourhood and globally, which would allow it to focus its resources on development. It also sought to maintain friendly relations with all countries, including both superpowers, to secure economic and technical assistance.
Step 3: Final Answer:
Three factors that shaped post-independence Indian foreign policy were its anti-colonial legacy, the prevailing Cold War rivalry which led to the policy of Non-Alignment, and the pressing need for economic development.
06
PYQ 2025
medium
civics ID: up-board
Who, among the following, is main founder of Indian Foreign Policy ?
1
Subhash Chandra Bose
2
Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel
3
Rajendra Prasad
4
Pt. Jawaharlal Nehru
Official Solution
Correct Option: (4)
Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
The question asks to identify the chief architect of India's foreign policy in its formative years after independence.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
Pt. Jawaharlal Nehru is widely regarded as the principal founder of India's foreign policy.
As India's first Prime Minister and also its first Minister of External Affairs, he held both portfolios from 1947 until his death in 1964.
He had a profound influence on shaping the core principles of India's approach to the world. Key tenets like the policy of Non-Alignment, Afro-Asian solidarity, and the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence (Panchsheel) were all formulated and championed by him. These principles guided India's foreign relations for decades.
While Sardar Patel had a significant role in domestic affairs, foreign policy was predominantly Nehru's domain.
Step 3: Final Answer:
Pt. Jawaharlal Nehru, as the first Prime Minister and Foreign Minister, was the main founder of Indian Foreign Policy.
Hence, option (D) is correct.
The question asks to identify the chief architect of India's foreign policy in its formative years after independence.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
Pt. Jawaharlal Nehru is widely regarded as the principal founder of India's foreign policy.
As India's first Prime Minister and also its first Minister of External Affairs, he held both portfolios from 1947 until his death in 1964.
He had a profound influence on shaping the core principles of India's approach to the world. Key tenets like the policy of Non-Alignment, Afro-Asian solidarity, and the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence (Panchsheel) were all formulated and championed by him. These principles guided India's foreign relations for decades.
While Sardar Patel had a significant role in domestic affairs, foreign policy was predominantly Nehru's domain.
Step 3: Final Answer:
Pt. Jawaharlal Nehru, as the first Prime Minister and Foreign Minister, was the main founder of Indian Foreign Policy.
Hence, option (D) is correct.
07
PYQ 2025
medium
civics ID: up-board
Who was the Prime Minister of India at the formation of Bangladesh ?
1
Morarji Desai
2
Rajiv Gandhi
3
Indira Gandhi
4
Lal Bahadur Shastri
Official Solution
Correct Option: (3)
Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
This question asks to identify the Indian Prime Minister who was in office during the creation of Bangladesh.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
The formation of Bangladesh was a direct result of the Bangladesh Liberation War and the subsequent Indo-Pakistani War of 1971.
During this period, from March to December 1971, the Prime Minister of India was Indira Gandhi.
She played a decisive role in the events. Her government provided diplomatic, economic, and military support to the Bengali nationalist movement in East Pakistan. The Indian Army's intervention in December 1971 led to the surrender of the Pakistani forces and the birth of the independent nation of Bangladesh.
Lal Bahadur Shastri passed away in 1966. Morarji Desai and Rajiv Gandhi served as Prime Ministers much later.
Step 3: Final Answer:
Indira Gandhi was the Prime Minister of India during the 1971 war and the formation of Bangladesh.
Therefore, option (C) is the correct answer.
This question asks to identify the Indian Prime Minister who was in office during the creation of Bangladesh.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
The formation of Bangladesh was a direct result of the Bangladesh Liberation War and the subsequent Indo-Pakistani War of 1971.
During this period, from March to December 1971, the Prime Minister of India was Indira Gandhi.
She played a decisive role in the events. Her government provided diplomatic, economic, and military support to the Bengali nationalist movement in East Pakistan. The Indian Army's intervention in December 1971 led to the surrender of the Pakistani forces and the birth of the independent nation of Bangladesh.
Lal Bahadur Shastri passed away in 1966. Morarji Desai and Rajiv Gandhi served as Prime Ministers much later.
Step 3: Final Answer:
Indira Gandhi was the Prime Minister of India during the 1971 war and the formation of Bangladesh.
Therefore, option (C) is the correct answer.
08
PYQ 2025
medium
civics ID: up-board
In which year was the Tashkent Agreement signed between India and Pakistan ?
1
1965
2
1966
3
1971
4
1972
Official Solution
Correct Option: (2)
Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
This question asks for the year of the signing of the Tashkent Agreement, a significant peace treaty in the history of India-Pakistan relations.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
The Indo-Pakistani War of 1965 was a culmination of skirmishes that took place between April and September 1965.
Following the end of hostilities, a diplomatic agreement was sought to establish peace. The Soviet Union mediated this agreement.
The peace agreement, known as the Tashkent Agreement, was signed in Tashkent (then in the Uzbek SSR, USSR; now in Uzbekistan) on 10 January 1966.
It was signed by India's Prime Minister, Lal Bahadur Shastri, and Pakistan's President, Muhammad Ayub Khan.
Therefore, the correct year is 1966.
Step 3: Final Answer:
The Tashkent Agreement was signed in the year 1966.
Hence, option (B) is the correct choice.
This question asks for the year of the signing of the Tashkent Agreement, a significant peace treaty in the history of India-Pakistan relations.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
The Indo-Pakistani War of 1965 was a culmination of skirmishes that took place between April and September 1965.
Following the end of hostilities, a diplomatic agreement was sought to establish peace. The Soviet Union mediated this agreement.
The peace agreement, known as the Tashkent Agreement, was signed in Tashkent (then in the Uzbek SSR, USSR; now in Uzbekistan) on 10 January 1966.
It was signed by India's Prime Minister, Lal Bahadur Shastri, and Pakistan's President, Muhammad Ayub Khan.
Therefore, the correct year is 1966.
Step 3: Final Answer:
The Tashkent Agreement was signed in the year 1966.
Hence, option (B) is the correct choice.
09
PYQ 2025
medium
civics ID: up-board
Discuss Indiaβs relations with China.
Official Solution
Correct Option: (1)
India and China are two of the worldβs most ancient civilizations and largest neighbors. Their relations have been marked by cooperation as well as conflict. 1. Early Friendship (1950s):
After independence, India recognized the Peopleβs Republic of China in 1950. The slogan βHindi-Chini Bhai-Bhaiβ symbolized friendship. In 1954, the two nations signed the Panchsheel Agreement, based on five principles of peaceful coexistence.
2. Border Disputes and War (1962):
Relations soured due to disputes over the Aksai Chin region (Ladakh) and Arunachal Pradesh. In 1962, China launched a war against India, which strained relations deeply and left unresolved border issues.
3. Post-War Tensions:
Throughout the 1960sβ1970s, relations remained tense, with limited communication. However, in 1976, diplomatic ties were restored at the ambassadorial level.
4. Rapprochement (1980sβ1990s):
In the 1980s, both countries began dialogue to reduce tensions. Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhiβs 1988 visit to China marked a turning point. Later, agreements in the 1990s focused on maintaining peace and tranquility along the Line of Actual Control (LAC).
5. Economic and Strategic Relations:
Since the 2000s, India and China have developed strong trade relations. China is now one of Indiaβs largest trading partners. Both nations also cooperate in international organizations like BRICS, SCO, and the UN. However, strategic rivalry remains due to Chinaβs closeness with Pakistan and influence in South Asia.
6. Recent Developments:
Border tensions resurfaced with incidents such as Doklam (2017) and the Galwan Valley clash (2020). While dialogue continues, mistrust remains a major challenge in India-China relations.
Conclusion:
India-China relations are characterized by a mix of cooperation and conflict. While economic ties are strong, unresolved border disputes and strategic rivalries remain key obstacles to building full trust between the two Asian giants.
After independence, India recognized the Peopleβs Republic of China in 1950. The slogan βHindi-Chini Bhai-Bhaiβ symbolized friendship. In 1954, the two nations signed the Panchsheel Agreement, based on five principles of peaceful coexistence.
2. Border Disputes and War (1962):
Relations soured due to disputes over the Aksai Chin region (Ladakh) and Arunachal Pradesh. In 1962, China launched a war against India, which strained relations deeply and left unresolved border issues.
3. Post-War Tensions:
Throughout the 1960sβ1970s, relations remained tense, with limited communication. However, in 1976, diplomatic ties were restored at the ambassadorial level.
4. Rapprochement (1980sβ1990s):
In the 1980s, both countries began dialogue to reduce tensions. Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhiβs 1988 visit to China marked a turning point. Later, agreements in the 1990s focused on maintaining peace and tranquility along the Line of Actual Control (LAC).
5. Economic and Strategic Relations:
Since the 2000s, India and China have developed strong trade relations. China is now one of Indiaβs largest trading partners. Both nations also cooperate in international organizations like BRICS, SCO, and the UN. However, strategic rivalry remains due to Chinaβs closeness with Pakistan and influence in South Asia.
6. Recent Developments:
Border tensions resurfaced with incidents such as Doklam (2017) and the Galwan Valley clash (2020). While dialogue continues, mistrust remains a major challenge in India-China relations.
Conclusion:
India-China relations are characterized by a mix of cooperation and conflict. While economic ties are strong, unresolved border disputes and strategic rivalries remain key obstacles to building full trust between the two Asian giants.
10
PYQ 2025
medium
civics ID: up-board
What two major challenges did the country face during Lal Bahadur Shastriβs tenure as Prime Minister?
Official Solution
Correct Option: (1)
Lal Bahadur Shastri served as Indiaβs Prime Minister from 1964 to 1966. During his short tenure, the country faced two major challenges:
1. Food Crisis:
- India faced acute shortage of food grains due to monsoon failures and lack of modern agricultural techniques.
- Shastri promoted the slogan βJai Jawan Jai Kisanβ to encourage farmers and strengthen agriculture.
2. Indo-Pak War of 1965:
- Pakistan launched military aggression against India in 1965.
- Shastri provided strong leadership, motivating both soldiers and citizens.
- The war ended with the Tashkent Agreement in January 1966.
Conclusion:
Thus, Lal Bahadur Shastriβs tenure was marked by food scarcity and the 1965 Indo-Pak war, both of which he handled with determination and simplicity.
1. Food Crisis:
- India faced acute shortage of food grains due to monsoon failures and lack of modern agricultural techniques.
- Shastri promoted the slogan βJai Jawan Jai Kisanβ to encourage farmers and strengthen agriculture.
2. Indo-Pak War of 1965:
- Pakistan launched military aggression against India in 1965.
- Shastri provided strong leadership, motivating both soldiers and citizens.
- The war ended with the Tashkent Agreement in January 1966.
Conclusion:
Thus, Lal Bahadur Shastriβs tenure was marked by food scarcity and the 1965 Indo-Pak war, both of which he handled with determination and simplicity.
11
PYQ 2025
medium
civics ID: up-board
Who ruled Goa before it became an independent state of the Indian Union?
1
Britain
2
France
3
Portugal
4
Spain
Official Solution
Correct Option: (3)
Step 1: Historical background of Goa
- Goa was under Portuguese colonial rule for more than 450 years, starting from 1510.
- The Portuguese established Goa as their stronghold in India, making it the capital of their Eastern empire.
Step 2: End of colonial rule
- Even after India gained independence in 1947, Portugal refused to give up Goa.
- In December 1961, the Indian Armed Forces launched Operation Vijay to liberate Goa.
- As a result, Goa was freed from Portuguese control and integrated into the Indian Union.
Step 3: Analyzing the options
- (A) Britain: Incorrect, Britain ruled most of India but not Goa.
- (B) France: Incorrect, France controlled small territories like Puducherry, not Goa.
- (C) Portugal: Correct, Goa was a Portuguese colony until 1961.
- (D) Spain: Incorrect, Spain had no colonial presence in India.
Step 4: Conclusion
Thus, before becoming part of India, Goa was ruled by Portugal.
- Goa was under Portuguese colonial rule for more than 450 years, starting from 1510.
- The Portuguese established Goa as their stronghold in India, making it the capital of their Eastern empire.
Step 2: End of colonial rule
- Even after India gained independence in 1947, Portugal refused to give up Goa.
- In December 1961, the Indian Armed Forces launched Operation Vijay to liberate Goa.
- As a result, Goa was freed from Portuguese control and integrated into the Indian Union.
Step 3: Analyzing the options
- (A) Britain: Incorrect, Britain ruled most of India but not Goa.
- (B) France: Incorrect, France controlled small territories like Puducherry, not Goa.
- (C) Portugal: Correct, Goa was a Portuguese colony until 1961.
- (D) Spain: Incorrect, Spain had no colonial presence in India.
Step 4: Conclusion
Thus, before becoming part of India, Goa was ruled by Portugal.
12
PYQ 2025
medium
civics ID: up-board
When and where did Lal Bahadur Shastri Ji die?
Official Solution
Correct Option: (1)
Lal Bahadur Shastri, the second Prime Minister of India, passed away on 11 January 1966 in Tashkent (present-day Uzbekistan, then part of the Soviet Union).
- Shastri Ji had gone to Tashkent to sign a peace agreement with Pakistan after the Indo-Pak War of 1965.
- This agreement, known as the Tashkent Agreement, was signed on 10 January 1966 under the mediation of the Soviet Union.
- Only a few hours after signing the agreement, Lal Bahadur Shastri Ji died suddenly due to a heart attack.
- His death shocked the entire nation, as he was respected for his simplicity, honesty, and the inspiring slogan βJai Jawan Jai Kisanβ.
Conclusion:
Thus, Lal Bahadur Shastri Ji died on 11 January 1966 in Tashkent, leaving behind a legacy of integrity, patriotism, and leadership in times of crisis.
- Shastri Ji had gone to Tashkent to sign a peace agreement with Pakistan after the Indo-Pak War of 1965.
- This agreement, known as the Tashkent Agreement, was signed on 10 January 1966 under the mediation of the Soviet Union.
- Only a few hours after signing the agreement, Lal Bahadur Shastri Ji died suddenly due to a heart attack.
- His death shocked the entire nation, as he was respected for his simplicity, honesty, and the inspiring slogan βJai Jawan Jai Kisanβ.
Conclusion:
Thus, Lal Bahadur Shastri Ji died on 11 January 1966 in Tashkent, leaving behind a legacy of integrity, patriotism, and leadership in times of crisis.
13
PYQ 2025
medium
civics ID: up-board
With which country did India sign the Indus Water Agreement in 1960?
1
Nepal
2
Bhutan
3
Pakistan
4
Afghanistan
Official Solution
Correct Option: (3)
Step 1: Background of the Indus Water Agreement
- The Indus Waters Treaty was signed in 1960 between India and Pakistan, with the World Bank as a mediator.
- The treaty was designed to allocate the use of water from the six rivers of the Indus basin between the two countries.
Step 2: Key terms of the Treaty
- The three western rivers β Indus, Jhelum, and Chenab β were allocated to Pakistan.
- The three eastern rivers β Ravi, Beas, and Sutlej β were allocated to India.
- India retained limited rights for irrigation, power generation, and transport on the western rivers, but without altering their flow.
Step 3: Analyzing the options
- Nepal: Not related to this treaty.
- Bhutan: No such treaty with Bhutan in 1960.
- Pakistan: Correct, the treaty was signed between India and Pakistan.
- Afghanistan: Incorrect, no such agreement in 1960.
Step 4: Conclusion
Thus, India signed the Indus Water Agreement in 1960 with Pakistan.
- The Indus Waters Treaty was signed in 1960 between India and Pakistan, with the World Bank as a mediator.
- The treaty was designed to allocate the use of water from the six rivers of the Indus basin between the two countries.
Step 2: Key terms of the Treaty
- The three western rivers β Indus, Jhelum, and Chenab β were allocated to Pakistan.
- The three eastern rivers β Ravi, Beas, and Sutlej β were allocated to India.
- India retained limited rights for irrigation, power generation, and transport on the western rivers, but without altering their flow.
Step 3: Analyzing the options
- Nepal: Not related to this treaty.
- Bhutan: No such treaty with Bhutan in 1960.
- Pakistan: Correct, the treaty was signed between India and Pakistan.
- Afghanistan: Incorrect, no such agreement in 1960.
Step 4: Conclusion
Thus, India signed the Indus Water Agreement in 1960 with Pakistan.
14
PYQ 2025
medium
civics ID: up-board
From which year did India adopt Act East Policy?
1
1992
2
1995
3
2014
4
2009
Official Solution
Correct Option: (3)
Step 1: Background of Indiaβs Look East Policy
- India initially adopted the Look East Policy in 1992 under Prime Minister P. V. Narasimha Rao.
- Its aim was to strengthen economic and strategic relations with Southeast Asian nations, especially ASEAN countries.
Step 2: Transformation to Act East Policy
- In 2014, under Prime Minister Narendra Modi, the Look East Policy was upgraded to the Act East Policy.
- This new approach emphasized not only economic cooperation but also strategic, cultural, and connectivity partnerships with ASEAN, Japan, South Korea, and East Asia.
Step 3: Analyzing the options
- 1992: Correct for Look East Policy, but not Act East Policy.
- 1995: Incorrect, no major policy shift.
- 2014: Correct year of Act East Policy adoption.
- 2009: Incorrect.
Step 4: Conclusion
Thus, India adopted the Act East Policy in the year 2014.
- India initially adopted the Look East Policy in 1992 under Prime Minister P. V. Narasimha Rao.
- Its aim was to strengthen economic and strategic relations with Southeast Asian nations, especially ASEAN countries.
Step 2: Transformation to Act East Policy
- In 2014, under Prime Minister Narendra Modi, the Look East Policy was upgraded to the Act East Policy.
- This new approach emphasized not only economic cooperation but also strategic, cultural, and connectivity partnerships with ASEAN, Japan, South Korea, and East Asia.
Step 3: Analyzing the options
- 1992: Correct for Look East Policy, but not Act East Policy.
- 1995: Incorrect, no major policy shift.
- 2014: Correct year of Act East Policy adoption.
- 2009: Incorrect.
Step 4: Conclusion
Thus, India adopted the Act East Policy in the year 2014.
15
PYQ 2025
medium
civics ID: up-board
Examine India's foreign policy in the current context.
Official Solution
Correct Option: (1)
Indiaβs foreign policy has evolved significantly since independence, and in the current context, it continues to reflect the countryβs aspirations of becoming a global power. The major factors influencing Indiaβs foreign policy today include its national security concerns, economic growth, global partnerships, and regional dynamics. Below are the key elements of Indiaβs foreign policy in the contemporary context:
1. Strategic Autonomy:
Indiaβs foreign policy has always emphasized strategic autonomy, meaning it seeks to maintain independence in decision-making without aligning with any major power bloc. India pursues multi-alignment, which involves building relationships with various countries, both developed and developing, based on national interest rather than ideologies. The country avoids getting involved in bloc politics and strives to maintain a non-aligned stance in its diplomatic dealings.
2. Focus on Regional Security:
India's foreign policy has increasingly focused on regional security, particularly in South Asia. India aims to maintain peace and stability in its neighborhood, especially concerning Pakistan and China. The ongoing conflict with Pakistan over Jammu and Kashmir, along with frequent border tensions with China, are critical elements of Indiaβs security policy. India's active role in the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) and the Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation (BIMSTEC) is aimed at promoting regional cooperation.
3. Strengthening Ties with Major Powers:
India has placed a significant emphasis on strengthening its relations with major powers, such as the United States, Russia, Japan, and the European Union. The India-U.S. relationship, in particular, has grown substantially over the past two decades. India and the U.S. cooperate in various areas such as defense, trade, and technology. India also continues to maintain a strategic partnership with Russia, especially in defense and energy sectors.
4. Economic Diplomacy:
Indiaβs foreign policy places significant emphasis on economic diplomacy, seeking to enhance its trade relations and secure access to global markets. With the rise of the "Make in India" initiative, India has actively worked to attract foreign direct investment (FDI), promote innovation, and establish itself as a global manufacturing hub. The countryβs growing engagement with global organizations like the World Trade Organization (WTO) and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) highlights its active participation in shaping the global economic order.
5. Strategic Partnerships in the Indo-Pacific:
The Indo-Pacific region has become a focal point of Indiaβs foreign policy, as it is critical for its economic growth, trade routes, and regional security. India has strengthened its relations with countries in the Indo-Pacific region, including Japan, Australia, and ASEAN countries, through forums such as the Quad (Quadrilateral Security Dialogue). India is keen on ensuring a free, open, and inclusive Indo-Pacific, where no single power dominates.
6. Defense Diplomacy:
India's defense diplomacy has become more prominent, with India seeking to build stronger defense ties with key global players. The country has been actively involved in joint military exercises and defense technology exchanges with nations like the United States, France, Russia, and Japan. India has also taken a more proactive role in the United Nations peacekeeping missions.
Conclusion:
Indiaβs foreign policy today is characterized by its focus on strategic autonomy, regional security, and economic diplomacy. The countryβs role in global politics is growing, and it is increasingly seen as a key player in shaping global governance, security, and economic trends. India is positioning itself as a responsible global power that balances its domestic priorities with its international aspirations.
1. Strategic Autonomy:
Indiaβs foreign policy has always emphasized strategic autonomy, meaning it seeks to maintain independence in decision-making without aligning with any major power bloc. India pursues multi-alignment, which involves building relationships with various countries, both developed and developing, based on national interest rather than ideologies. The country avoids getting involved in bloc politics and strives to maintain a non-aligned stance in its diplomatic dealings.
2. Focus on Regional Security:
India's foreign policy has increasingly focused on regional security, particularly in South Asia. India aims to maintain peace and stability in its neighborhood, especially concerning Pakistan and China. The ongoing conflict with Pakistan over Jammu and Kashmir, along with frequent border tensions with China, are critical elements of Indiaβs security policy. India's active role in the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) and the Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation (BIMSTEC) is aimed at promoting regional cooperation.
3. Strengthening Ties with Major Powers:
India has placed a significant emphasis on strengthening its relations with major powers, such as the United States, Russia, Japan, and the European Union. The India-U.S. relationship, in particular, has grown substantially over the past two decades. India and the U.S. cooperate in various areas such as defense, trade, and technology. India also continues to maintain a strategic partnership with Russia, especially in defense and energy sectors.
4. Economic Diplomacy:
Indiaβs foreign policy places significant emphasis on economic diplomacy, seeking to enhance its trade relations and secure access to global markets. With the rise of the "Make in India" initiative, India has actively worked to attract foreign direct investment (FDI), promote innovation, and establish itself as a global manufacturing hub. The countryβs growing engagement with global organizations like the World Trade Organization (WTO) and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) highlights its active participation in shaping the global economic order.
5. Strategic Partnerships in the Indo-Pacific:
The Indo-Pacific region has become a focal point of Indiaβs foreign policy, as it is critical for its economic growth, trade routes, and regional security. India has strengthened its relations with countries in the Indo-Pacific region, including Japan, Australia, and ASEAN countries, through forums such as the Quad (Quadrilateral Security Dialogue). India is keen on ensuring a free, open, and inclusive Indo-Pacific, where no single power dominates.
6. Defense Diplomacy:
India's defense diplomacy has become more prominent, with India seeking to build stronger defense ties with key global players. The country has been actively involved in joint military exercises and defense technology exchanges with nations like the United States, France, Russia, and Japan. India has also taken a more proactive role in the United Nations peacekeeping missions.
Conclusion:
Indiaβs foreign policy today is characterized by its focus on strategic autonomy, regional security, and economic diplomacy. The countryβs role in global politics is growing, and it is increasingly seen as a key player in shaping global governance, security, and economic trends. India is positioning itself as a responsible global power that balances its domestic priorities with its international aspirations.
16
PYQ 2025
medium
civics ID: up-board
Mention any two principles of Indian foreign policy.
Official Solution
Correct Option: (1)
India's foreign policy is characterized by its commitment to peace, sovereignty, and strategic non-alignment. Since its independence, India has maintained a foreign policy that focuses on maintaining good relationships with all nations while avoiding entanglements in major power blocs. Some key principles of Indian foreign policy include:
1. Non-Alignment:
Non-alignment, or the policy of not aligning with any major global power bloc, was a cornerstone of Indiaβs foreign policy post-independence. Indiaβs first Prime Minister, Jawaharlal Nehru, articulated this policy during the Cold War, when the world was divided into two blocs: the Western bloc led by the United States and the Eastern bloc led by the Soviet Union. India maintained its independence by not joining either of these blocs and instead pursued a policy of independent and neutral decision-making in international affairs.
India sought to assert its sovereignty and avoid external interference, standing for the principle that nations should be free to determine their policies without undue influence from powerful countries. The Non-Aligned Movement (NAM), which India co-founded, was created to promote peaceful coexistence and cooperation among newly independent countries, largely in Africa, Asia, and Latin America.
2. Peaceful Coexistence (Panchsheel):
The principle of peaceful coexistence was a fundamental tenet of India's foreign policy, especially in the context of its relations with neighboring countries. India emphasizes mutual respect for territorial integrity and sovereignty, non-interference in each other's internal affairs, and the peaceful resolution of disputes.
This principle was formalized in the Panchsheel Agreement (1954) between India and China, which laid down five basic principles for bilateral relations:
- Mutual respect for each otherβs territorial integrity and sovereignty.
- Non-aggression.
- Non-interference in each otherβs internal affairs.
- Equality and mutual benefit.
- Peaceful coexistence.
India's foreign policy stresses that all nations, regardless of their size or power, should coexist peacefully and settle differences through diplomatic channels, rather than through the use of force.
Conclusion:
The principles of non-alignment and peaceful coexistence have allowed India to navigate complex international relationships while maintaining its independence and promoting global peace. These principles have shaped Indiaβs diplomatic efforts and continue to guide its foreign policy today.
1. Non-Alignment:
Non-alignment, or the policy of not aligning with any major global power bloc, was a cornerstone of Indiaβs foreign policy post-independence. Indiaβs first Prime Minister, Jawaharlal Nehru, articulated this policy during the Cold War, when the world was divided into two blocs: the Western bloc led by the United States and the Eastern bloc led by the Soviet Union. India maintained its independence by not joining either of these blocs and instead pursued a policy of independent and neutral decision-making in international affairs.
India sought to assert its sovereignty and avoid external interference, standing for the principle that nations should be free to determine their policies without undue influence from powerful countries. The Non-Aligned Movement (NAM), which India co-founded, was created to promote peaceful coexistence and cooperation among newly independent countries, largely in Africa, Asia, and Latin America.
2. Peaceful Coexistence (Panchsheel):
The principle of peaceful coexistence was a fundamental tenet of India's foreign policy, especially in the context of its relations with neighboring countries. India emphasizes mutual respect for territorial integrity and sovereignty, non-interference in each other's internal affairs, and the peaceful resolution of disputes.
This principle was formalized in the Panchsheel Agreement (1954) between India and China, which laid down five basic principles for bilateral relations:
- Mutual respect for each otherβs territorial integrity and sovereignty.
- Non-aggression.
- Non-interference in each otherβs internal affairs.
- Equality and mutual benefit.
- Peaceful coexistence.
India's foreign policy stresses that all nations, regardless of their size or power, should coexist peacefully and settle differences through diplomatic channels, rather than through the use of force.
Conclusion:
The principles of non-alignment and peaceful coexistence have allowed India to navigate complex international relationships while maintaining its independence and promoting global peace. These principles have shaped Indiaβs diplomatic efforts and continue to guide its foreign policy today.
17
PYQ 2025
medium
civics ID: up-board
What is the meaning of Panchsheel?
Official Solution
Correct Option: (1)
Panchsheel, also known as the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence, refers to a diplomatic and philosophical framework developed by India and China in the 1950s. The term "Panchsheel" means "five virtues" or "five principles," and it was introduced to ensure harmonious and peaceful relations between nations, particularly in the context of the Indian and Chinese relationship. Panchsheel became an important part of Indiaβs foreign policy after independence, and it emphasized mutual respect, cooperation, and peaceful coexistence among nations. These principles were integral to India's stance on maintaining its sovereignty and neutrality in global affairs.
The Five Principles of Panchsheel are as follows:
1. Mutual respect for each other's territorial integrity and sovereignty.
2. Mutual non-aggression.
3. Non-interference in each other's internal affairs.
4. Equality and mutual benefit.
5. Peaceful coexistence.
These principles were designed to avoid conflicts and ensure harmonious relations between countries. They also laid the foundation for Indiaβs policy of non-alignment and peaceful diplomacy with neighboring countries and beyond.
Conclusion:
Panchsheel continues to influence India's foreign policy, promoting peaceful coexistence, mutual respect, and non-interference in the internal matters of other countries. It is considered an important milestone in the diplomatic relations between India and China, as well as India's role in global peacekeeping.
The Five Principles of Panchsheel are as follows:
1. Mutual respect for each other's territorial integrity and sovereignty.
2. Mutual non-aggression.
3. Non-interference in each other's internal affairs.
4. Equality and mutual benefit.
5. Peaceful coexistence.
These principles were designed to avoid conflicts and ensure harmonious relations between countries. They also laid the foundation for Indiaβs policy of non-alignment and peaceful diplomacy with neighboring countries and beyond.
Conclusion:
Panchsheel continues to influence India's foreign policy, promoting peaceful coexistence, mutual respect, and non-interference in the internal matters of other countries. It is considered an important milestone in the diplomatic relations between India and China, as well as India's role in global peacekeeping.
18
PYQ 2025
medium
civics ID: up-board
Tashkent Agreement was signed between whom?
1
India-Pakistan
2
India-Nepal
3
India-Sri Lanka
4
India-Bhutan
Official Solution
Correct Option: (1)
Step 1: Context of the Tashkent Agreement
The Tashkent Agreement was signed on January 10, 1966, in Tashkent, Uzbekistan, between India and Pakistan. The agreement aimed to restore peace and normalise relations between the two nations after the 1965 India-Pakistan war. The key leaders who signed the agreement were Lal Bahadur Shastri (Prime Minister of India), Ayub Khan (President of Pakistan), and the Soviet Premier, Leonid Brezhnev, as a mediator. Step 2: Analyzing the Options
- (A) India-Pakistan: Correct. The Tashkent Agreement was signed between India and Pakistan following the 1965 war, facilitated by the Soviet Union. - (B) India-Nepal: Incorrect. The Tashkent Agreement involved India and Pakistan, not Nepal. - (C) India-Sri Lanka: Incorrect. This agreement was not between India and Sri Lanka. - (D) India-Bhutan: Incorrect. The Tashkent Agreement was not between India and Bhutan. Step 3: Conclusion
The correct answer is (A), as the Tashkent Agreement was signed between India and Pakistan in 1966 to restore peace between the two countries.
The Tashkent Agreement was signed on January 10, 1966, in Tashkent, Uzbekistan, between India and Pakistan. The agreement aimed to restore peace and normalise relations between the two nations after the 1965 India-Pakistan war. The key leaders who signed the agreement were Lal Bahadur Shastri (Prime Minister of India), Ayub Khan (President of Pakistan), and the Soviet Premier, Leonid Brezhnev, as a mediator. Step 2: Analyzing the Options
- (A) India-Pakistan: Correct. The Tashkent Agreement was signed between India and Pakistan following the 1965 war, facilitated by the Soviet Union. - (B) India-Nepal: Incorrect. The Tashkent Agreement involved India and Pakistan, not Nepal. - (C) India-Sri Lanka: Incorrect. This agreement was not between India and Sri Lanka. - (D) India-Bhutan: Incorrect. The Tashkent Agreement was not between India and Bhutan. Step 3: Conclusion
The correct answer is (A), as the Tashkent Agreement was signed between India and Pakistan in 1966 to restore peace between the two countries.