Indian Constitution

Step 1: Understanding the eligibility for Vice President of India.
According to Article 66 of the Constitution of India, the Vice President must fulfil certain qualifications. One of the most important requirements is that the person must be at least 35 years of age. The candidate must also be a citizen of India and eligible to be elected as a member of the Rajya Sabha.
Step 2: Checking the age requirement.
To determine eligibility, we compare the ages given in the table with the constitutional requirement of 35 years.

• W is 30 years old.
• X is 25 years old.
• Y is 34 years old.
• Z is 69 years old.

Only a person who is 35 years or older can contest for the post of Vice President.
Step 3: Analysis of the options.

• (A) X: Age is 25 years, which is below the required age of 35.
• (B) W: Age is 30 years, which is also below the required limit.
• (C) Y: Age is 34 years, still below the minimum age requirement.
• (D) Z: Age is 69 years, which satisfies the constitutional requirement.

Step 4: Conclusion.
Therefore, among the given persons, only Z satisfies the minimum age requirement and is eligible to become the Vice President. Final Answer: Z.

Step 1: Understanding writ jurisdiction.
The Constitution of India empowers the Supreme Court and High Courts to issue writs to protect the fundamental rights of citizens. These writs are legal orders used to prevent misuse of authority and to safeguard personal liberty.
Step 2: Meaning of Habeas Corpus.
The term Habeas Corpus literally means "to produce the body". It is issued when a person is illegally detained or imprisoned. The court orders the authority responsible for the detention to produce the person before the court and justify the legality of the detention.
Step 3: Analysis of other options.

• (A) Habeas Corpus: Correct. Used when a person is unlawfully detained.
  
• (B) Quo Warranto: Issued to question the authority by which a person holds a public office.
  
• (C) Mandamus: Issued to command a public authority to perform its official duties.
  
• (D) Certiorari: Issued by a higher court to quash the order of a lower court or tribunal.
  

Step 4: Conclusion.
Since Mr. Anand has been illegally detained by the police, the appropriate writ to challenge unlawful detention is Habeas Corpus.
Final Answer: Habeas Corpus.

Step 1: Understanding President's Rule.
President's Rule in a state is imposed under Article 356 of the Constitution of India. It is declared when the constitutional machinery of a state fails and the state government cannot function according to constitutional provisions.
Step 2: Role of the Governor.
The Governor of a state sends a report to the President stating that the state government cannot function properly. Based on this report or recommendation, the President may declare President's Rule in that state.
Step 3: Analysis of the options.

• (A) The President: The President proclaims President's Rule but it is usually based on the Governor's recommendation.
• (B) The Vice President: The Vice President has no role in imposing President's Rule.
• (C) The Governor: Correct. The Governor recommends to the President that President's Rule should be imposed in the state.
• (D) The Chief Justice of India: The Chief Justice has no role in recommending President's Rule.

Step 4: Conclusion.
Thus, President's Rule in a state is proclaimed on the recommendation of the Governor. Final Answer: The Governor.

Step 1: Understanding jurisdiction of the High Court.
The High Court exercises different types of jurisdiction such as original jurisdiction, appellate jurisdiction, advisory jurisdiction, and revisory jurisdiction. Each jurisdiction refers to a specific type of legal authority exercised by the court.
Step 2: Meaning of original jurisdiction.
Original jurisdiction means that a case can be filed directly in the High Court and the court has the authority to hear and decide the matter for the first time. Matters related to certain legal disputes, including issues concerning revenue collection or constitutional matters, may fall under this jurisdiction.
Step 3: Analysis of the options.

• (A) Advisory: Incorrect. Advisory jurisdiction refers to giving legal advice when requested by the President or other authorities.
• (B) Revisory: Incorrect. Revisory jurisdiction refers to reviewing decisions of lower courts.
• (C) Original: Correct. Matters relating to revenue collection of the state fall under the original jurisdiction of the High Court.
• (D) Appellate: Incorrect. Appellate jurisdiction refers to hearing appeals from lower courts.

Step 4: Conclusion.
Therefore, the correct replacement for the word "Consultative" in the sentence is "Original". Final Answer: Original.